An Online History Museum Of Reefer Madness Propaganda 
                               Dating Back To The Mid 1800's & All The Lies That We Were Told



                                                                    Button Ads!                          

   Grow Shop's Directory Product Reviews                              Mega Text Ad's Spaces Available!      
                   Find Local Hydroponics Shops and Grow Stores.  
10-10-14                                            Advertise On All 3 Of Our Marijuana Websites





 Listen Right Here Online
 From The 1930's Thru 
1950's To The Real Original
"Reefer Madness" Radio
 Shows & Programs


  Reefer Madness Teaching Museum Main Page #1


  Reefer Madness Teaching Museum Main Page #2


  Reefer Madness Propaganda Comic Books Readable Online


The Ebers Papyrus Oldest (confirmed) Egyptian
Medical Textbook About
Marihuana Dated From
Around 1,550 Years BC


Table Of Contents  
     Lists Every Page

Please Visit Our Sister Websites

The Complete Guide 
To Medical Marijuana

Maine Patients


Chris Kenoyer. Owner
MMJ Patient
Director Of 
The Maine Patients Coalition,
Medical Marijuana Activist, 
Online Patients Advocate, 
Online News Journalist, 

My Medical Bio 

Email Us Here At 


To translate text or 
a web page go to:
Language Tools 
Google Translations


1999-2013 Copyright  
All Rights Reserved.

No part of this site maybe used or reproduced in whole or in part without  the written consent of the Copyright Owner Chris Kenoyer 

   The Online Reefer Madness Teaching Museum


            American Medical Association Opposes 
                  the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937



American Medical Association
Bureau of Legal Medicine and Legislation
Chicago, July 10, 1937
Hon. Pat Harrison
Chairman, Committee on Finance, United States Senate
Washington D.C.

 SIR: I have been instructed by the board of trustees of the American Medical Association to protest on behalf of the association against the enactment in its present form of so much of H.R. 6906 as relates to the medicinal use of cannabis and its preparations and derivatives. The act is entitled "An Act to impose an occupational excise tax upon certain dealers in marihuana, to impose a transfer tax upon certain dealings in marihuana, and to safeguard the revenue there from by registry and recording."

Cannabis and its preparations and derivatives are covered in the bill by the term "marihuana" as that term is defined in section 1, paragraph (b). There is no evidence, however, that the medicinal use of these drugs has caused or is causing cannabis addiction. As remedial agents, they are used to an inconsiderable extent, and the obvious purpose and effect of this bill is to impose so many restrictions on their use as to prevent such use altogether. Since the medicinal use of cannabis has not caused and is not causing addiction, the prevention of the use of the drug for medicinal purposes can accomplish no good end whatsoever. How far it may serve to deprive the public of the benefits of a drug that on further research may prove to be of substantial value, it is impossible to fores     


The American Medical Association has no objection to any reasonable regulation of the medicinal use of cannabis and its preparations and derivatives. It does protest, however, against being called upon to pay a special tax, to use special order forms in order to procure the drug, to keep special records concerning its professional use and to make special returns to the Treasury Department officials, as a condition precedent to the use of cannabis in the practice of medicine. in the several States, all separate and apart from the taxes, order forms, records, and reports required under the Harrison Narcotics Act with reference to opium and coca leaves and their preparations and derivatives.

If the medicinal use of cannabis calls for Federal legal regulation further than the legal regulation that now exists, the drug can without difficulty be covered under the provisions of the Harrison Narcotics Act by a suitable amendment. By such a procedure the professional use of cannabis may readily be controlled as effectively as are the professional uses of opium and coca leaves, with less interference with professional practice and less cost and labor on the part of the Treasury Department.

It has been suggested that the inclusion of cannabis into the Harrison Narcotics Act would jeopardize the constitutionality of that act, but that suggestion has been supported by no specific statements of its legal basis or citations of legal authorities.

Wm. C. Woodward,

Legislative Counsel


[Whereupon at 11:37 AM Monday, July 12, 1937, the subcommittee adjourned.]


                          Back to Page #1