The Online Reefer Madness Teaching Museum.Org
An
Online History
Museum Of Reefer Madness Propaganda
|
*************************
*************************
*************************
And The Maine Patients Coalition.org **************************** Chris Kenoyer. Owner Email Us Here At 1999-2009 Copyright © |
The Online Reefer Madness Teaching Museum
CONGRESSIONAL
RECORD—SENATE (March 5, 1935 # 2963) THE NARCOTIC DRUG EVILMr. COPELAND. Mr. President, I ask that a series of addresses made in connection with the narcotic evil be inserted in the RECORD. As health commissioner of New York I became familiar with the evils of the traffic in narcotic drugs, and I am heartily in sympathy with the efforts being made to deal adequately with the problem. I am informed that the last in the series of broadcasts on this subject will be an address by the Attorney General of the United States. There being no objection, the matter was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: BROADCAST OVER THE NATIONAL NETWORK FEBRUARY 27, 1935The announcer said: "This is the fourth in a series of broadcasts under the auspices of the World Narcotic Defense Association, of which Admiral Richmond P. Hobson is president. The narcotic association is now carrying on a comprehensive campaign to secure adoption by all our States of a uniform law on narcotics. " Today eminent narcotic authorities will discuss the general question of law versus the narcotic drug evil.' Mr. Hayne Davis, vice president of the narcotic association, will conduct the broadcast and present the speakers." Mr. Davis said: “The urgent need Is to secure interstate accord on narcotics through adoption of the uniform narcotic drug act by all the States of our Union. You are privileged today to hear from the very highest authorities on this subject: The United States Commissioner of Narcotics, Mr. H. J. Anslinger; the president of the American Bar Association, Hon. Scott M. Loftin, of Florida: the president of the Bar Association in 1932, when that association endorsed the proposed uniform narcotic drug act, Hon. Clarence E. Mart" of West Virginia. The subject of the of the discussion is ‘Law Versus the Narcotic Drug Evil.’ " The first Speaker is Mr. H. J. Anlsinger, the able, faithful, and efficient United States Commissioner of Narcotics---the chief Federal official for enforcement of the national narcotic laws and treaties---Mr. Anslinger.” ADDRESS BY MR. H. J. ANSLINGER, UNITED STATES COMMISSIONER OF NARCOTICS Opium has been a boon to mankind in alleviating suffering, but a terrible curse to those who have become victims to its abuse. The hope of a practical solution lies in strict control of the production, sale, and distribution of narcotic drugs, as well as of the raw materials capable of use in the making of these drugs. Great progress has been made in these directions, and further progress is in prospect. The first opium conference was the outcome of American Initiative. Similar conferences, with wider scope, followed in due course, at The Hague in 1912, at Geneva in 1925 and 1931. The delegates assembled at these conferences from all parts of the world were appalled by the evidence of human wreckage and misery, through the abuse of narcotics which was laid before them. They were alarmed also by proof that this evil was rapidly spreading throughout the world. Some of those who were thus enlightened as to the fact and extent of narcotic drug abuse, resolved to stamp out this evil, and at each conference they succeeded In securing general consent to some plans calculated to further this good purpose. At the 1931 conference great strides were taken by agreement upon terms for effective limitation of the manufacture of narcotic drugs to the actual needs of mankind, for scientific and medicinal purposes, and for strict control of the drugs manufactured for these purposes so that none of them would find their way into the channels of illicit trade. The treaty evolved by that conference constitutes the most powerful blow that has thus far been dealt to the illicit narcotic traffic. This treaty is now the basis of international accord on narcotics. Indeed, the Limitation Treaty of 1931 may properly be called the Magna Carta of world freedom from the narcotic drug tyrant. Internationally, the allied forces in the warfare on the narcotic drug evil have achieved great victories, and are now consolidated in a strong position, well prepared for the next offensive. In the United States, however, there is weakness in the lines of defense against this enemy of all mankind. "This la due not to willingness among our good people to let this evil have its way here but to the division of sovereign power between the Nation and the States composing the Union, and to the difficulties encountered in getting full information on the narcotic problem Into the hands of the several thousand State legislators, who alone have power to enact the laws necessary for consolidating this country behind the National Government in the splendid position it has taken on narcotics. Long ago the Treasury Department took steps so far as it lawfully could to limit manufacture of narcotic drugs in the United States to the needs of this country for scientific and medicinal purposes. Its broad policy is to limit the importation of opium and coca leaves to the medical and scientific needs as determined by the United States Public Health Service, and to control manufacture and the distribution of the drugs made from the raw material so imported. This distribution is under effective control from Importation of the raw material to delivery of the manufactured drug to the consumer. I know of no finer tribute to the control system of your National Government than one expressed by a delegate of Canada at a recent world narcotic conference. He said that the United states manufactures drugs for 120,000,000 people, and that there is a 3,000-mile border between the two countries, making smuggling comparatively simple, yet in all his experience he had never found narcotics of American manufacture in the illicit traffic in Canada, although he found large quantities of narcotics of European manufacture. “Our entire field force does not exceed 300 officers for the whole United States, or 1 for each 400,000 of the population, and It can be readily, seen that the ordinary police work of narcotic law enforcement, such as the detection and apprehension of the many petty street peddlers and the even greater number of those Improperly possessing narcotics, cannot be adequately performed by Federal officers. State cooperation is essential to a reasonably adequate system of narcotic law enforcement, and the several States of the Union have a serious obligation to perform in doing their proper part in the suppression of this evil. "The adoption of a uniform narcotic drug act by all the States will do away with the existing weaknesses in our narcotic laws by giving to the people of the United States and of each State as good protection against the narcotic evil as can be secured through legislative action, will enable the authorities of the States to cooperate more effectively with each other and with the officials of the National Government, and will be a great aid to the United States in properly fulfilling its part in combating the narcotic evil in those phases which can be dealt with effectively only through international cooperation. We obligated ourselves to control production of opium under The Hague Convention of 1912. We can fulfill that obligation under this State legislation." Mr. Davis said: "Thank you. Mr. Commissioner. “No one knows better than Mr. Anslinger what the present law an narcotics is and what that law ought to be. [page
2964] "Members of the bar who have been recognized by their colleagues as worthy of election to the presidency of the American Bar Association are certainly qualified to plead the cause of law versus the narcotic drug evil before the supreme court of public opinion. You will now hear the views of Hon. Scott M. Loftin, of Florida, president of the American Bar Association, regarding the uniform narcotic drug act. Mr. Loftin found it impossible to be here today, so I shall read a message received from him. "MESSAGE FROM HON. SCOOT M. LOFTIN, OF FLORIDAIt has long been customary for the Governors of the several States to appoint commissioners on uniform State laws to confer with one another on those questions, in which uniformity in the laws of the States is deemed to be for the best interests of the people. The Forty-second Annual Conference of these Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, held in 1932, formulated a comprehensive program of legislation on the narcotic problem, which is commonly known as the " uniform narcotic drug act." The American Bar Association held Its meeting for that year soon after this act was approved by the conference of commissioners. The act came very appropriately, therefore, before the Bar Association for consideration at its 1932 session. "The Honorable Clarence E. Martin was president of the Bar Association that year, and he was also a member of the Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, which formulated this act. He is especially well qualified, therefore, to explain in detail how the adoption of this act by all the States will promote the welfare of the American people. As President of the American Bar Association, I content myself, therefore, with saying that there is no member of our association better qualified than Mr. Martin to demonstrate the present need for adoption of this act by all of our State legislatures. In addition, I am saying a few words more as a citizen of the State of Florida. The proposed uniform narcotic drug act was adopted by the Florida Legislature in May 1933, and the people of Florida were benefited substantially and immediately. " The Jacksonville Journal, in Its issue of October 27, 1933, carried a strong editorial concerning the uniform narcotic drug act, entitled ‘The Workings of a Good Law' and worded as follows: "
'Few enactments of the 1933 legislature were more significant In purpose or
sounder in design than the uniform State narcotic law. "'
‘Occasion for reflection In this regard was presented
by the important marijuana arrest and seizure here last week. " 'The sale on
which the case was made involved 2 pounds of the dried weed prepared for
smoking. "'
Subsequent investigations led to a larger seizure and the discovery that the
plant from which the drug is made has been grown Inside the city limits of
Jacksonville. "
'First among the points to be noted is that the case could not have been made
prior to the passage of the uniform State law.
The Harrison Act applies only to opium and coca leaves and their
derivatives. "'In
the second place, the case affords illustration of the integration of
enforcement agencies under the new law. It
resulted from the cojoint efforts of Federal, State, and city forces. "'Again,
it properly relegates the prosecution of such crime to local courts set up for
handling of local problems. The
Federal Bureau of Narcotics is left free to exercise its major function of
controlling medical movements and smuggling. "'Eight
of the 24 cases made here strictly under the uniform law have been tried and
eight convictions have been returned. "'Scheduled
for trial are two types of cases not covered previously.
One doctor's license is up for revocation and several addicts will be
prosecuted for obtaining narcotics under false pretenses. "'Revocation
of medical licenses and restriction of drug Issue through misrepresentation by
addicts were not provided for In former laws. “ ‘Through the
closing up of loopholes and the coordination of existing regulatory agencies,
the new uniform State law places that control upon a higher basis of
Intelligence and efficiency. "
'Florida is in the vanguard of States adopting it.’ "I conclude by saying that, in my opinion, all of the States should adopt the uniform narcotic drug act, so as to effectively cooperate with the Federal Government in its war against the illegal drug traffic, and, I will add, so as to secure for the people of each State the protection which we In Florida now enjoy through the adoption of this act in 1933. SCOTT M. LOFTIN, “President American Bar Association.” Mr. Davis then said: "Here you have proof from experience, brief but convincing. And after hearing these words of Mr. Loftin, president of the American Bar Association, in regard to the qualifications of Hon. Clarence E. Martin, of West Virginia, that gentleman needs no further introduction. Mr. Martin." [ More talk on the subject of narcotics and the uniformed narcotics law, but not about marihuana] Back to Reefer Madness Page #1 |