*************************
*************************
*************************
***************************************** Chris Kenoyer. Owner Email Us Here At ***************************** 1999-2012 Copyright © |
The Online Reefer Madness Teaching Museum
Industrial And Engineering Chemistry- [News Edition] - Vol. 31, (or 17) Feb. 20, 1939 - pp-117 Marihuana
Preliminary Note on Investigation Herbert J. Wollner Treasury Department, Washington, D. C.
THE structure of the chemical entity responsible for the typical "hashish" action of the plant Cannabis sativa or marihuana and its preparations is unknown. There is no qualitative chemical test for it, nor is there any quantitative measure of it save only a bioassay of value so doubtful that it was deleted from the U. S. Pharmacopoeia XI. The activity is resident in a so-called resin which may be prepared rather readily from the plant itself. This substance is a complex mixture, from which only a single pure compound has been directly crystallized---a paraffin hydrocarbon containing 29 carbon atoms. The substance possesses no "hashish" activity, hence is of little interest. Following removal of the hydrocarbon, the resin, which obstinately resists partition by other means, may be separated into fractions by vacuum distillation. The high-boiling fraction, sometimes referred to as the "red oil," or "crude cannabinol," contains the active material and possesses so many of the attributes of a pure compound that it has been regarded as such by a number of investigators. Others have definitely shown it to be, on the contrary, a complex mixture from which only one pure compound has as yet been separated. This is pure cannabinol which separates crystalline as the acetate following treatment of the mixture with acetic anhydride or, better, acetyl chloride and pyridine. Pure cannabinol has no "hashish" activity. Its reactions have shown it to possess the structure of a substituted dibenzopyran. The mixture from which cannabinol has been separated, either as acetate or as p-nitrobenzoate, retains the typical physiological activity. It has been found resistant to the usual techniques of partition, but a preliminary note indicates that it may be fractionated by chromatographic analysis. No details have been published, except that certain of the fractions are physiologically active. Since continuing progress in the administration of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 must be dependent, in a large measure, on accumulation of knowledge concerning the growth, preparation, distribution, and effect of the drug, there has been initiated in the Treasury Department laboratories a broad program of research which includes, as one of its principal objectives, the isolation and characterization of the substance or substances responsible for the characteristic action. In Pursuance of this objective, it is proposed at the outset to take advantage of the sharper fractionation possible under conditions of molecular distillation. To this end the drug has been extracted with alcohol, and the alcohol solution extracted with low-boiling petroleum ether. Removal of the petroleum ether leaves a very viscous, dark green oil which is separated into two parts by "flash" distillation of the volatile portion. The apparatus is operated at a pressure of 0.1 to 0.2 mm. Distillation is effected in four chambers maintained at 220º, 240º, 250º, and 250º, through which the oil flows progressively. The combined distillate collects in one receiver and the tar, which amounts in the present case to somewhat more than 60 per cent of the total, is received in another. The distilled portion is a reddish brown oil, very viscous at room temperature. It contains sensibly all the physiologically active material present in the original alcohol extract. The crude oil,[1] so obtained, is introduced into a molecular distillation apparatus of the static rather than cyclic type and separated into ten fractions at a pressure of 2 X 10-4 mm. Certain of these have been found extremely active, and it is proposed, by further distillation of these active fractions under the same or lower pressures, to concentrate the activity to a greater extent than has heretofore been attained. When no further concentration can be effected in this manner the mixture will be treated chemically to form an acyl derivative, probably the acetate, which will then be fractionated as before. From the fractions in which the activity is most concentrated by these procedures it is hoped to isolate the pure active principle or principles by one or more of a number of processes, many of which have proved unsuccessful with the "red oil"--- for example, low temperature crystallization, precipitation of derivatives, chromatographic analysis, and others. Physiological activity of the various products obtained is being followed through bioassay on the dog and mouse, conducted by S. Loewe, of the Cornell University Medical College. Further
reports of the progress of this investigation, and others, will be made from
time to time as conditions warrant. [1]
This mixture has been found to contain, in addition to the active
principle, the substances responsive to the Duquenois test, the Ghamrawy test,
and the alkaline (but not the acid) Beam test.
Results obtained thus far indicate rather definitely that more than one
compound present in the resin contributes to response to the Duquenois test, and
that the compound responsive to the alkaline Beam test is not the
physiologically active principle. Back to Reefer Madness Page #1 |